Reform of the Moldovan System of Vocational Education and Training (1998-2000)
Type of project/activity:
Sector analysis and strategy development
Objectives:
The TACIS project for VET development aimed to carry out a local and national
labour market analysis; develop new curricula curriculum and teacher training
(with pilots schools) and develop the policy and strategy for taking forward
reform.
Background:
The Moldovan context was one of financial crisis. The Soviet Union was not
buying Moldovan agricultural products and the price of energy, supplied by
the former, had risen exponentially during the 1990s. VET school budgets only
received a 25 percent contribution from central government (and it was being
further reduced) and the schools had to increase alternative sources of revenue,
such as the sale of products; local taxation; parental contributions; contributions
from local enterprises; payroll taxes as well as undertaking all the classic
cost lowering mechanisms.
Partners:
The project was managed by a Danish/Dutch Consortium. David Parkes directed
the policy and strategy component.
Main activities:
The policy and strategy component worked towards the production of a 'Green
Paper'. The project was organised around three task groups each of which has
Moldovan membership and a Moldovan chairperson, with an external consultant.
The policy and strategy task group was composed of three vice ministers (education,
labour and economy), the social partners, local/regional representatives and
VET pilot school directors. The group was chaired by the Head of the Reform
and Development Department of the Ministry of Education. It had a finance
sub-group with representatives from the three ministries and the social partners.
The pressures towards decentralisation and privatisation were, in the context, inexorable. The pressing questions for Government (and therefore the project task group) were how to define and protect a minimum education base for VET to include the possibilities of adaptability and progression for student clients and how to define the steering role of the Ministry of Education (particularly for standards) in the face of declining financial contributions.
Professional development of the working group was undertaken during the project by a series of seminars bringing in EU experts on specific thematic areas and through the organisation of study visits to EU countries (Netherlands, Denmark).
Name of programme, funder or client:
EU TACIS Programme
Expected outcomes, reports/documents:
A Green Paper was drafted in 2000. The main recommendations were subsequently
accepted by government, drafted in the form of 'white paper' adopted by an
inter-ministerial group. In 2001, the legislation was passed both by the Council
of Ministers and by the Parliamentary Assembly. Despite a positive evaluation
of the programme's outcomes by the EU, to date there has been no follow-up
EU funding to support the White Paper recommendations.
For more information, please contact
David Parkes parkes@wanadoo.fr